The country's previous leader has been handed capital punishment for atrocities stemming from her harsh response on protests led by students which led to her ousting.
Hasina was declared culpable of allowing lethal force to be used against protesters, with approximately 1,400 individuals lost their lives during the disturbances during 2024.
The trial proceeded without her presence by the special international tribunal in Bangladesh, since she went into exile in India following her ouster in July 2024.
Prosecutors accused her of being responsible for hundreds of killings during the protests. Hasina has denied every accusation, labeling the proceedings as "biased and politically motivated".
The decision signifies a pivotal moment for Bangladesh, as the protests revealed fury over years of repression. Next of kin of victims and wounded had called for severe punishments.
Answering the judgment in a comprehensive declaration, the former leader stated the death penalty was the caretaker administration's way of "eliminating her political faction" as a governing body and that she was satisfied of her administration's performance on civil liberties.
"I have no trepidation to confront those accusing me in a proper tribunal where the facts can be assessed and examined justly."
The nation's capital, Dhaka, where the legal proceedings occurred, was under enhanced protection ahead of the decision on Monday, with numerous opponents of Hasina organizing a demonstration and cheering as the sentence was declared.
The capital witnessed a recent spike in disturbances, with multiple explosives detonated and coaches ignited in the time before the verdict.
One explosive incident was reported in Dhaka on Monday morning, with zero injuries documented, area law enforcement officer the police spokesperson informed press agencies.
The protest movement led by students during 2024 commenced through requests to remove government job quotas but evolved into a wider anti-government movement.
United Nations rights examiners said in a report in February that the around 1,400 fatalities could represent "violations of human dignity".
The study recorded the firing at close quarters of some protesters, the deliberate maiming of further participants, unwarranted detentions and mistreatment.
Unauthorized recordings of a telephone conversation involving Hasina verified by external reviews earlier this year suggested she had authorized the use of "deadly arms" in July 2024. The sound file was broadcast in court during the legal process.
Prior to the ruling, kin of those fatally injured in the unrest told news agencies they wanted Hasina to be punished severely.
One relative, whose brother was shot dead in July 2024, said he wanted "strict sentence" for Hasina and others who have "committed acts of vengeance and misused their authority".
Lucky Akther, whose spouse died near Dhaka in August 2024, said she wanted the former leader's punishment to be "executed before the election".
"Only then the families of those killed [in the protests] will obtain solace in their minds."
Since Hasina's ousting, an caretaker administration headed by economist Muhammad Yunus has assumed control. A general election is planned for February 2026.
Nonetheless, the her former political organization, her political faction, was outlawed by Bangladesh's caretaker administration in May.
The former leader cautioned last month that if the her faction's nominees were barred from participating in the imminent electoral process, countless would abstain the vote.
The verdict now poses a foreign relations issue for the neighboring countries. The Bangladesh government has asked her extradition but until now India has expressed no readiness to acquiesce.
Hasina's state-appointed lawyer Mohammad Amir Hossain said he was "unhappy and desiring the outcome had varied".
"I cannot even contest because my represented individuals are away; which is why I am disheartened," he stated further.
The previous week, the defense attorneys said they had lodged a prompt application to the UN pointing out major judicial fairness and judicial process problems at the ICT.
The former leader faced trial together with her previous domestic affairs official and police chief.
Even though the verdict grants partial finality to kin of victims in the protests, it may not significantly ease the nation's partisan rifts.
"The anger against the former leader and the the former ruling faction has not subsided," a civil liberties campaigner in Dhaka informed media outlets. "Neither she nor the party has expressed regret or demonstrated contrition for the fatalities of countless citizens."
The advocate declared "This creates challenges for the party to be accepted by a bulk of the population in this country."
The campaigner further stated that the sentence was not resolution for the kin of those who died and were wounded.
"We support multiple individuals who lost their limbs forever, they are amputees now, as a result of the harsh measures. They are incapable of excusing her."
David Bergman, an observer of Bangladeshi affairs, said the "inherent character of the guilty verdict could make it particularly hard" for the political faction to become a regular participant of Bangladeshi politics again.
This may change if "there is some kind of apology and a distancing from the former leader and the former hierarchy," he expressed.