Tehran is prepared to resume nuclear discussions with the United States provided that it is treated with "respect" and "respect", Iran's top diplomat has announced.
The Iranian diplomat stated exclusively dialogue produced results, and shared new appeals had originated from intermediaries to restart talks with the American leadership. He claimed Iran possessed no unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran was not yet able to allow the UN nuclear inspectorate to inspect attacked atomic facilities for safety concerns.
The foreign minister is treading a challenging path since Iran does not want be perceived to be proceeding from a position of weakness, and he emphatically stated that Iran had emerged more powerful defensively and emotionally from the joint assault on its enrichment centers in June.
He was talking at a defense forum in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "an inalienable right to refine atomic fuel on home soil that it will never give up" – the key factor of the deadlock in the earlier negotiations.
The earlier sessions of negotiations between the US and Iran were brought to an abrupt and bitter conclusion on 12 June when Israel, with American backing, targeted Tehran's atomic facilities in a two-week conflict that culminated with the US president declaring the locations had been destroyed. Following this, EU nations exercised their privilege to restore international penalties, but Iran asserts they have not had a significant effect.
Iranian officials claimed they felt they had achieved a "magic solution" to the enrichment issue in prior discussions, when it was decided an domestic cooperative with American involvement could process nuclear material. The two nations would have been able to claim victory since home-based processing would have persisted and the US could be assured that Iran's atomic project was solely for peaceful purposes.
It had not been decided in the discussions that US nuclear scientists could work on Iranian soil, but that was a reasonable assumption of the partnership suggestion. Diplomats stated three times they had achieved a deal with Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff only for the deal to collapse due to "spoilers in Washington".
Iran's diplomats declared the consortium offer was now no longer available, but it seems very probable the suggestion could be reintroduced in various formats if talks resume.
The US president in recent days claimed he had been obtaining communications that Iran wanted to restart talks, but confidentially Iranian officials state they are not yet obtaining consistent overtures from America either explicitly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been accused of inactivity in the wake of the US president's straightforward manner, but Tehran says negotiations is not part of a performance.
In his remarks to the conference, intended to portray the US as a dominant force that exploits the notion of international law, the foreign minister stated the fortnight-long engagement showed the conflict could not be ended by armed force. He asserted the strikes started with a Washington's ultimatum for an unconditional Iranian surrender and ended with an unconditional call for a truce.
Iran is assured the first strikes by Israel were executed with full US knowledge and collaboration, making confidence challenging to reestablish.
Araghchi said: "It was not Iran that had fled diplomacy; it was America and the European states that had consistently attempted to impose their will during the negotiations. Diplomacy can still be active and remains the ultimate solution to resolve conflicts, but its criteria, regulations and tenets must be followed."
"If they talk to the Iranian people with the approach of respect and honor, they will receive a answer in the identical language."
In what is described by Iranian officials as the struggle of repair and recovery, the foreign minister stated he was confident Iran's security strengths "are much stronger than before 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been restored. We learned multiple understandings from this war; we have discovered our personal limitations and the shortcomings of the opponent."
He continued: "We effectively endured this war. Our nuclear technology, which they aimed to obliterate, continues to exist. The facilities and machinery, if destroyed, will be rebuilt; what is crucial is the determination of the citizens of Tehran and then the social solidarity that they sought to undermine, but failed to break. The Iranian people have grown more powerful, more united, and more supportive of the administration and the country in the face of this attack."